Showing posts with label Krishna. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Krishna. Show all posts

Tuesday, 1 January 2019

Traits of Mahapurushas (Colossus)

Among virtuous men the jnani is the best. Such a jnani is a mahapurusha — the greatest among the great. A mahapurusha overshadows the rest. The presence of the others will not be noticed when a mahapurusha is present. In the Bhagavad Gita, Lord Krishna says He is the best in every category. 

Mahapurushas perform all their duties, with a view to pleasing God. They are detached and reach God through bhakti or prapatti. They recite the Pranava mantra. Mahapurushas are not only knowledgeable about the dharma sastras, but also act according to them.

They are also humble. Mahapurushas are never arrogant. Being humble is not easy. That is why mahapurushas are respected - because of their humility. They think clearly and are never in a confused state of mind. Their lifestyle is simple. Their merciful glances can destroy our sins.

Saturday, 9 July 2016

TS and AP demands fresh allocations of Krishna river water.

KWDT II (Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal) II headed by Justice Brijesh Kumar in its award of 2010 allocated, over and above assured waters at 65% dependability allocated by KWDT I by Justice RS Bachavat during 1973, at 75% dependability and entire average availability of 2578 TMC as against 2060 TMC allocated by KWDT I without setting up any mechanism to ensure lower riparian states get their rightful share of waters at all times. This was contested in Supreme Court by AP and TS by an SLP (Special Leave Petition). In India, rivers being a state subject upper riparian states have natural advantages and lower riparian states suffer as reflected by 2015 Krishna river inflows into AP & TS at meager 80 TMC against usual 1000-1500 TMC in a good year. While Maharashtra and Karnataka dams were full AP & TS dams were empty with no crop in Krishna delta unheard over the past 150 years and unable to even meet drinking water needs.

While Bachavat tribunal was considerate towards lower riparian state of AP (including TS) by allowing unallocated and surplus waters to them with the contention they would suffer floods as well as lean year less inflows. While AP and TS were entangled in bifurcation issues, Maharashtra & Karnataka were able to convince Brijesh Kumar tribunal and get entire waters allocated depriving AP and TS (2578-2060=528-201) to the tune of 327 TMC of water. This has dealt deadly blow to several projects under construction to lift Srisailam waters to drought prone Rayalaseema and Mahboobnagar & Nalgonda districts dependent on unallocated surplus waters (while allocated waters are hardly sufficient for Krishna delta and NS Dam command area users).

The objective of Tribunal and River Water Management Board is to regulate upper riparian state(s) and ensure lower riparian state(s) gets their rightful shares of waters at all times.

Riparian rights, briefly are:
1. The right of a riparian owner to appropriate the water is limited to its use for such purpose, to such an extent and in such a way as will not be inconsistent with a similar use by the lower owners.
2. River waters shall be used with in the basin only.
3. The reasonable use of the water by a riparian owner is subject to the downstream riparian owners 'riparian right' to receive waters undiminished in flow and quality.
4. The doctrine of equitable apportionment alone, however, establishes only the equal right of each riparian to an equitable share in the benefits of the river.
5. Whenever new state were to come into existence will be on an "equal footing" with the original states.

Hence TS and AP's contention that consequent to formation of Telangana State during 2014, Krishna waters allocation must start afresh listening to all states contentions afresh including new state of Telangana is consistent with the general principles of riparian rights.However, central government submitting its view as the matter should be apportioned between AP and TS is not only contrary to general principles of riparian rights but also devoid of any merit.

Finally Pattiseema waters diversion can't be shared with Krishna water allottees for the following reasons:-
1. Pattiseema LI scheme diverts Godavari flood waste waters, not allocated waters.
2. Pattiseema is not a gravity flow project but an Lift Irrigation project involving huge capital & operational expenses.
3. Pattiseema is a purely AP state's temporary project and would get closed once Polavaram project becomes operational at a later date.
4. Pattiseema LI scheme was neither funded by Centre nor by Planning Commission.
5. As and when Polavaram becomes operational, quantity of Godavari waters diverted to Krishna basin, will definitely be shared with Krishna riparian rights owners i.e. Maharashtra, Karnataka, Telangana and Andhra Pradesh.



Tuesday, 5 July 2016

Pulichintala & Pattiseema saves Krishna Delta while KWDT II ditches

Krishna delta is turning into a rain-fed area with the prevailing drought conditions and fall in water levels in reservoirs of Krishna river. More than 40 per cent of farmers gave up cultivation with the drought conditions and the remaining farmers are unable to continue cultivation under bore wells. More pertinent problem is non-remunerative prices and fragmented land holdings apart from delay in getting water for timely paddy transplantation.

Prior to 1850, Krishna delta suffered famines and drought while Krishna river was flowing as usual into sea. Bezwada Anicut (today's Prakasam Barrage) was conceived during 1790's by East India Company but construction only started after Sir Arthur Cotton approved the scheme in 1850 and completed in 1855, after completion of Dowleswaram Barrage in 1852. Ever since there was no looking back and these two deltas became rice bowls supplying rice to entire state of undivided Andhra Pradesh.

After 100 years, Bezwada Anicut breached in 1952 floods and Prakasam Barrage was constructed upstream of Anicut between 1954-57 at less than Rs.3 crores. Including canal systems its value at today's corrected price levels could be about Rs.3,000 crores irrigating 13 lakh acres at an average per acre investment of less than  Rs.20,000 per acre and operating costs near NIL compared to Kaleswaram project with per acre capital cost of Rs.10,00,000 and annual operating cost of Rs. 25,000+ providing water for dry crops. Nagarjuna Sagar dam upstream has stabilized the delta immensely. With its rich soils Krishna delta gives highest yields of paddy producing paddy worth about Rs.6,000+ crores every year. Prakasam Barrage was the first Major Irrigation Project in South India and today owing to it, Krishna district became very rich district and Vijayawada, once a sleepy town smaller than Machilipatnam, Guntur, Gudivada, Nandigama & Nuzvid, with its excellent road & rail connectivity  grew leaps and bounds into a very large city and eventually became state's capital.

Timely transplantation of paddy during June/July is essential for Krishna delta because of frequent cyclones during October & November. Being low lying & water logged lands Krishna Delta can cultivate only paddy, which alone can withstand water logging, during kharif season.

With several projects having come up upstream on Krishna district and with no mechanisms to ensure timely release of irrigation water to Krishna delta has created difficulties to farmers of Krishna delta. Polavaram right canal was supposed to solve this problem but that project is also moving at snails pace with apathetic BJP - Modi government at Center. Sensing a delay of 5 to 8 years this Govt of AP, headed by Nara Chandrababu Naidu, has implemented Pattiseema Lift Irrigation, a temporary project, in a record time to pump Godavari flood waters into Polavaram right canal which was complete by about 80% during YSR & Congress regime, and diversion of 80 TMC water to Prakasam Barrage upstream to ensure paddy transplantation in delta during July. This would also ensure diversion of water saved at Srisailam Dam into Srisailam Right Bank Canal & other projects namely Pothireddipadu, Handri-Neeva, Galeri-Nagari etc. to perennially drought prone Rayalaseema region strengthening him politically as well.

While Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal - I headed by Justice RC Bachavat it its award of 1976 was considerate to lower riparian state of Andhra Pradesh, rejected several illogical issues raised by Karnataka with the sole aim of depriving water to AP as much as possible, allocated entire surplus & deficit waters to AP without claiming rights at 65% dependability and not allocating surplus waters to riparian states in the absence of strong enforcement arrangements. 

While allocated Krishna waters were utilized at Krishna delta and Nagarjuna Sagar Canals, AP (composite) has started several projects with the objective of diverting and utilizing surplus and flood waters from Srisailam back waters into Rayalaseema and Mahboobnagar & Nalgonda districts of Telangana, all were perennially drought prone, with the heavy duty Lift Irrigation motors now a days available.

Pulichintala Project completed except for R & R on Telangana state side (deliberately with sadistic intention of creating troubles to AP) with 46 TMC capacity will impound water during summer months from Nagarjuna Sagar releases mainly for power generation by TS, will be splendidly sufficient along with 80 TMC Pattiseema waters for timely transplantation in Krishna Delta.

However, Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal - II headed by Justice Brijesh Kumar, in its award of 2010 dealt a deadly blow to AP (while AP was entangled with the agitations for bifurcation and formation of Telangana state for political reasons) succumbed to pressures of Karnataka & Maharashtra politicians namely Veerappa Moily, Sharad Pawar, Shivraj Patil, Sushil Kumar Shinde etc managed to get entire average yield (allocated & unallocated waters at 75% yield, increasing from of 65%) of 2578 TMC allocated to riparian states, without any strong enforcing mechanisms in place, thus depriving AP of surplus waters by 317 TMC and with a ruling that Karnataka should release about 8-10 TMC during June & July from its Alamatti dam for benefit of AP. It is pertinent to state that Krishna Delta alone consumes 180 TMC of water with 40% i.e. 72 TMC,  required at the time of paddy transplantation. What purpose 16-20 TMC will serve, God only knows? 

Year 2015 being low rain fall year - while Karnataka & Maharashtra projects are full of water down stream AP received just 80 TMC inflows against 1001 TMC allocation and usual flow of more than 1500 TMC. There was no agriculture in Krishna basin in AP and drinking water in Krishna basin became an unmanageable problem.

As expected, Govt of AP filed Special Leave Petition in Supreme Court against KWDT II award and prayed for direction to Govt of India not to notify the award from implementation.


Previous ... KWDT I & II Awards






KWDT Awards I & II

Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal I (RS Bachawat) Final Award of 1976

The Bachavat Tribunal awarded 800 TMC ft, 695 TMC ft and 565 TMC ft to AP, Karnataka and Maharashtra respectively, out of 2060 TMC ft at 75 per cent dependability of water available in the river. The 75 per cent dependability of water was calculated based on 78 years.

For the purpose of this case, the 75 per cent dependable flow of the river Krishna up to Vijayawada is 2060 T.M.C.

  1. Maharashtra shall not use in any water year more than 560 T.M.C.
  2. Karnataka shall not use in any water year more than 700 T.M.C
  3. Andhra Pradesh will be at liberty to use in any water year the remaining
    water that may be flowing in the river Krishna but thereby it shall not acquire
    any right whatsoever to use in any water year nor be deemed to have been
    allocated in any water year water of the river Krishna in excess of the quantity specified here under 800 T.M.C.
Tribunal's order shall be reviewed by a competent authority at any time after May 31, 2000.
Some observations & clarifications:

Failure of any state to make use of any portion of the water allocated to it during any water year shall not constitute forfeiture or abandonment of its share. State will not be entitled to claim the unutilised water in any subsequent water year; and any other State may make use of the unutilised water, and such use shall not be charged to the share of that other State, but thereby it shall not acquire any right whatsoever in any such use. 

"Water year" commences on 1st June and ends on 31st May.

Nothing in the Order shall impair the power of any State to regulate within its boundaries the use of water, or to enjoy the benefit of waters within that State in a manner not inconsistent with the Order of this Tribunal.

Andhra Pradesh will be at liberty to use the excess flow in surplus years and at the same time will have to bear the burden of the deficiency in lean years save as indicated in this Report.

It is not possible to provide for the sharing of the surplus or deficiency in the absence of a regulating authority. In the absence of regulating authority "Final Order" provides for distribution of 75 per cent dependable flow of 2060 T.M.C. only.

Excess up to 2130 T.M.C. as follows:— 

  1. State of Maharashtra — 35 per cent of such excess. 
  2. State of Karnataka — 50 per cent of such excess. 
  3. State of Andhra Pradesh — 15 per cent of such excess. 

Excess over 2130 T.M.C. as follows :— 

  1. State of Maharashtra — 25 per sent of such excess. 
  2. State of Karnataka — 50 per cent of such excess. 
  3. State of Andhra Pradesh — 25 per cent of such excess. 

States of Maharashtra, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh will be free to make use of underground water within their respective State territories in the Krishna river basin and shall not be reckoned as use of the water of the river Krishna.

Domestic and municipal by 20 per cent of the quantity of water and Industrial use by 2.5 per cent of the quantity of water diverted or lifted from the river or any of its tributaries or from any reservoir, storage or canal. 

There is no ground for limiting the use of the remaining water by Andhra Pradesh to its existing carry-over capacity. If the remaining water is not used by Andhra Pradesh, it will be wasted to the sea. 

We see no ground for making additional allocations to Karnataka save as mentioned in this Report. 

We reject the argument of Karnataka that 4 T.M.C. of water allowed in respect of the pondage loss at Krishna Barrage is liable to be deducted from the allocation to Andhra Pradesh. We reject the argument of Karnataka that the allocation of 3 T.M.C. in respect of evaporation loss at Nagarjunasagar is liable to be deducted from the share of Andhra Pradesh.

We have allowed Andhra Pradesh to store water in the Srisailam Dam after its completion to the extent and in the manner it would be feasible for it to do so and to utilise the water impounded in the storage in any manner it deems proper and in lieu thereof no deduction has been made from the 75 per cent dependable flow on account of the inevitable waste to the sea of a part of the flow between Nagarjunasagar Dam and Vijayawada.

No State has proprietary interest in any particular volume of water of an inter-state river on the basis of its irrigable area or contribution.


Nothing contained herein shall prevent the alteration amendment or modification of all or any of the foregoing clauses by agreement between the parties or by legislation by Parliament.

https://archive.org/stream/KrishnaWaterDisputeTribunalAwardVolumeIv/volume4_djvu.txt

Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal II (Brijesh Kumar)Final Award of 2010
Dependable yield is determined as follows :- 
  1. Average yield                     - 2578 TMC 
  2. Yield at 50% dependability - 2626 TMC 
  3. Yield at 60% dependability - 2528 TMC 
  4. Yield at 65% dependability - 2293 TMC 
  5. Yield at 75% dependability - 2173 TMC
it is decided that the water of river Krishna be distributed among the three States of Maharashtra, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh on 65% dependability of the new series of 47 years i.e. 2293 TMC.

That it is hereby decided that the surplus flows which is determined as 285 TMC (2578 TMC minus 2293 TMC= 285 TMC) be also distributed among the three States.

  1. State of Maharashtra ——— 666 TMC 
  2. State of Karnataka ————  911 TMC  
  3. State of Andhra Pradesh — 1001 TMC 
  4. TOTAL ————————    2578 TMC
The above restrictions are inclusive of evaporation losses.

While KWDT I made project wise allocations with freedom to states to manage as they like with in the over all limit rejecting Maharashtra & Karnataka's arguments for statewise allocations, KWDT II allocating statewise allocations without stating any reason for departing from KWDT I's methodology. AP's contention is that upper states will construct to excess capacities and lower states interests would get seriously hampered during low monsoon years was not heeded compelling them to file SLP in Supreme Court.

Since the allocations have been made at different dependabilities, the party States are directed to utilize the water strictly in accordance with the allocations. “Krishna Waters Decision – Implementation Board” to be set up for implementation of the provisions of the decisions.

State of Karnataka shall release 8 to 10 TMC of water to the State of Andhra Pradesh from Almatti Reservoir in the months of June and July, as regulated releases.

Nothing contained herein shall prevent the alteration,amendment or modification of all or any of the Clauses by agreement between the Parties.

Decision and directions given by KWDT-I which have not been amended, modified or reviewed by this order shall continue to be operative.


At any time after 31st May, 2050, order may be reviewed or revised by a Competent Authority or Tribunal.


http://wrmin.nic.in/writereaddata/Inter-StateWaterDisputes/KWDTReport9718468760.pdf


Previous ... Riparian Rights

Monday, 4 July 2016

Riparian Rights

Riparian water rights (or simply riparian rights) is a system for allocating water among those who possess land along its path.

The English water law first adopted in the United States was premised on the natural flow doctrine, pursuant to which a riparian owner has the right to a natural water flow of undiminished quantity and unimpaired quality.

In general, the right of a riparian owner to appropriate the water is 
limited to his use for such purposes, to such an extent and in such a 
way as will not be inconsistent with a similar use by the lower owners. 
Since the effect upon the lower riparian proprietor is made the test, 
it would make little difference whether the water was taken for use on 
riparian or non-riparian lands, just so long as it did not essentially 
interfere with the exercise of the common right by the other riparian 
owners.If the use is lawful and beneficial, it must be deemed to be 
reasonable, and not an infringement of the right of other riparian 
owners to whom it occasions no actual and perceptible damages either 
as to the present or future use of the riparian land. The question in 
such a case is not whether the diversion being for a legitimate use 
and in quantity such as is reasonable, having regard to all the 
circumstances, but only whether it causes actual damage to the 
person complaining.

General Principle:
Under the riparian principle, all landowners whose properties adjoin a body of water have the right to make reasonable use of it as it flows through or over their properties. If there is not enough water to satisfy all users, allotments are generally fixed in proportion to frontage on the water source. These rights cannot be sold or transferred other than with the adjoining land and only in reasonable quantities associated with that land. The water cannot be transferred out of the watershed without due consideration as to the rights of the downstream riparian landowners.

Riparian rights include such things as the right to access for swimming, boating and fishing; the right to wharf out to a point of navigability; the right to erect structures such as docks, piers, and boat lifts; the right to use the water for domestic purposes; the right to accretions caused by water level fluctuations; the right to exclusive use if the water body is non-navigable. Riparian rights also depend upon "reasonable use" as it relates to other riparian owners to ensure that the rights of one riparian owner are weighed fairly and equitably with the rights of adjacent riparian owners.

Under riparian law, water is a public good like the air, sunlight, or wildlife. It is not "owned" by the government, state or private individual but is rather included as part of the land over which it falls from the sky or then travels along the surface.

In determining the contours of riparian rights, there is a clear distinction between navigable (public) waters and non-navigable waters. The land below navigable waters is the property of state, and subject to all the public land laws and in most states public trust rights. Navigable waters are treated as public highways with any exclusive riparian right ending at the ordinary high water mark. Like a road, any riparian right is subordinate to the public's right to travel on the river, but any public right is subject to nuisance laws and the police power of the state. It is not an individual right or liberty interest. Because a finding of navigability establishes state versus federal property, navigability for purposes of riverbed title is a federal question determined under federal law; the states retain residual power to define navigability for the purposes of defining the public trust over water within their borders.

The reasonable use of the water by a riparian owner is subject to the downstream riparian owners 'riparian right' to receive waters undiminished in flow and quality. Since all surface waters eventually flow to the public ocean, federal regulatory authority under the Clean Waters Act, like the Clean Air Act, extends beyond only public (navigable) waters to prevent downstream pollution. Land beyond the low water mark belongs to the state government.

The doctrine of equitable apportionment is oriented toward satisfying equally the interests of all riparians. The doctrine of equitable apportionment alone, however, establishes only the equal right of each riparian to an equitable share in the benefits of the river. The total benefits of the river have to be shared equitably by all the riparians is apt to engender the incentive for enlarging the opportunities to be shared through joining in a regional project.

Whenever new state were to come into existence will be on an "equal footing" with the original states.

Also see Water Appropriation Systems

Srisailam Project

The Srisailam Dam is constructed across the Krishna River on the border of Mahabubnagar District, Telangana and Kurnool district, Andhra Pradesh near Srisailam temple town and is the 2nd largest capacity working hydroelectric station in the country.
The dam was constructed in a deep gorge in the Nallamala Hills in between Mahabubnagar and Kurnool districts, 980 ft  above sea level. It is 1,680 ft long, 476 ft maximum height and has 12 radial crest gates. It has a reservoir of 616 square kilometres. Project has an estimated live capacity to hold 179 Tmc at its full reservoir level of 885 feet MSL. The left bank underground power station houses 6 × 150 megawatts reversible turbines for pumped-storage operation and the right bank semi under ground power station houses 7 × 110 megawatts generators.
Tail pond dam /weir located 14 km downstream of Srisailam dam is under advanced stage of construction to hold the water released by the hydro turbines and later pump back in to the Srisailam reservoir by operating the turbines in pump mode. The weir portion got breached in November 2015 unable to withstand the normal water release from the hydro power stations.
The Srisailam project began in 1960, initially as a power project. After several delays, the main dam was finally completed twenty years later in 1980 July 26. In the meantime the project was converted into a multipurpose facility with a generating capacity of 770 megawatts by its second stage which was completed in 1987. The dam is to provide water for an estimated 2,000 square kilometres. Under the right bank branch canal 790 square kilometres in Kurnool and Kadapa districts will have assured irrigation. From the initial modest estimate of ₹38 crores for a power project the total cost of the multipurpose project was estimated to cross₹1,000 crores in its enlarged form. The dam has alone cost ₹400 crores together with the installation of four generating sets of 110 MW each. The right bank branch canal is estimated to cost ₹449 crores and the initial investment of ₹1400 crores has been provided by the World Bank. On 2 October 2009, Srisailam dam experienced a record inflow which threatened the dam.

 




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Srisailam_Dam

Previous ... Nagarjuna Sagar Project

Nagarjuna Sagar Project

The multipurpose Nagarjunasagar Project on the river Krishna near the then Nandikonda village (now Hill Colony), Peddavoora Mandal, Nalgonda District, is the pride of Andhra Pradesh.
Even though the Project was also conceived by the erstwhile Government of Hyderabad and put forth under the name 'Lower Krishna Project' (Nandikonda site) nothing much has happened. However, Muktyala Raja's singular efforts were mainly responsible for Khosla committee visiting the site, submitting favorable report and approval by Planning commission with the help of then Governor Chandulal Trivedi, Acharya NG Ranga, Kotha Raghuramaiah, Vavilala Gopala Krishnaiah, Moturi Satyanarayana and KL Rao culminating in Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru laying foundation stone on Dec 10, 1955.
The Planning Commission appointed the Khosla Committee to examine and report on the optimum and most beneficial utilization of Krishna River waters. The recommendations of the Committee, which were later endorsed by the Planning Commission in December, 1952, are to construct Nandikonda Dam across Krishna River with full reservoir level at +590.00 feet with canals taking off on either side.  Water allocated to the Project is 281 TMC.  The foundation stone of the Dam was laid by the late Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, the first Prime Minister of India on 10.12.1955.  The Nandikonda Project was renamed as Nagarjunasagar Project under the inspiring name of the great Buddhist Savant, Acharya Nagarjuna and construction commenced from the year 1956 and Dam construction was completed in the year 1969 and water was first let out partially in the canals during the year 1967. Erection of gates on spillway was completed during the year 1974.



This irrigation project comprises of a 409 feet high Masonry Dam flanked with Earthen Dams to a maximum height of 85 feet to create a lake with gross storage capacity of 408.24 TMC at +590.00 feet level, with two canals taking off from the reservoir at either flank.  This project also stabilizes irrigation under Krishna Delta System and the required water to Krishna delta is released through 8 power Units with an installed capacity to generate 810 M.W. of power.
The designed discharging capacity of the two main canals is 11,000 Cusecs each with provision for increasing the capacity.  This project is having a vast net work of irrigation system spread over 5 districts.  The length of the Right Main Canal is 126 miles with an ayacut of 11.13 lakh acres (4.505 lakh Ha.).  The length of the Left Main Canal is 111 miles with an ayacut of 9.555 lakhs acres (3.869 lakh Ha.). The length of Branch Canals and Distributors under Right and left canal and left Canal is 9000 miles, 6000 miles respectively.  The latest reassessed cost of the project is Rs. 1025 Crores. 



            
  • Reassessed cost of the project is Rs. 1025 crores as on 01, April '98
  • Length of Masonry Dam 4756 ft
  • Height of Dam 409 ft
  • Length of Right Earth Dam 2800 ft
  • Length of Left Earth Dam 8400 ft
  • Catchment Area at Dam Site 2,15,185 Sq. Kms 
  • Gross Capacity 408 TMC
  • Live Capacity as per minimum draw down level + 510 ft. 202 TMC
  • Water spread area 285 Sq Kms
  • Dead Storage Level 400 ft
  • Full Reservoir Level 590 ft
  • Main power House 810 MW
  • Right Bank Canal Power House 90 MW
  • Left Bank Canal Power House 60 MW
  • N.S.R.C  11.19 lakh acres
  • N.S.L.C    9.82 lakh acres
  • TOTAL    21.01 lakh acres

Muktyala Raja

Raja Vasireddy Ramagopala Krishna Maheswara Prasad, popularly known as Muktyala Raja (4 October 1917 – 28 August 1972) was instrumental in the construction of the Nagarjuna Sagar Dam, the tallest masonry dam in the world, in the state of Andhra Pradesh, India, which is across the river Krishna.





The Raja of Muktyala strived hard for the construction of the Pulichintala Project across the river Krishna, a dream which has taken shape recently. He came to know that the Government of Madras Presidency has made plans to divert Krishna river water to Madras by linking Krishna and Pennar rivers. He embarked upon a tour of nine districts of Andhra Pradesh and visited each and every village to collect the signatures of people in favor of Nagarjuna Sagar Dam project. He traveled through the thick and inhospitable jungles near Macherla to visit the site of Nandikonda and formed a team of retired engineers at his own expense to make the project plans and designs. The government of Madras tried to scuttle his plans for which the Raja established the 'Krishna Farmers Welfare Society' and exerted pressure on the Government of India in favor of the Nagarjuna Sagar Dam. The Government of India instituted the Khosla Committee but the committee refused to visit the site on the excuse that there was no motor-able road to Nandikonda. The Raja gathered villagers and volunteers from twenty five villages and made a road by laboring day and night for a week at his own expense. The Khosla committee visited the site and found it to be the most ideal location to build a gigantic dam across the river.
There were attempts to suppress the report of the Khosla committee. The Raja went to New Delhi and with the support of Acharya N. G. Ranga, Moturi Satyanarayana, K.L. Rao, Vavilala Gopalakrishnaiah and Kotha Raghuramaiah resurrected the report, distributed it to important people and urged the Planning Commission (Government of India) to take cognizance.
Chandulal Trivedi, the Governor of the state of Andhra Pradesh urged the Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru to accept the report of the Khosla Committee. An announcement was made in 1954 for the construction of the project. The foundation stone was laid by Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru on December 10, 1955. Raja spent fifty two lakhs of rupees as a matching grant for the project construction. The waters of Krishna river were released for the farmers on August 3, 1966.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raja_of_Muktyala

Previous ... Prakasam Barrage

Prakasam Barrage

Prakasam Barrage was constructed across the River, Krishna near Vijayawada city in Andhra Pradesh on upstream side of the breached and damaged century old anicut. It is a Regulator built on sand foundations, combined with a road bridge of 24 Ft for two lane traffic with 5 Ft wide foot paths on either side, connecting Chennai-Kolkata Highway. The Barrage was necessitated to be constructed to meet the demands of the increased irrigation ayacut of 13 lakhs acres.

Prakasam Barrage is the first major irrigation project of South India. 

The old anicut breached during 1952 and during inspection Superintending Engineer Sri Vepa Krishna Murthy and other staff have demised their lives.

Construction of the Barrage was taken up on 13-2-1954 and completed  when the  road bridge  was open for public traffic after inauguration on 24-12-1957. The project was completed with in 3 ½ years with less cost and high quality. 

The total project cost was Rs.2.78 crores.




BENEFITS
  1. Assured water supply to the increased ayacut of 13.00 lakh acres in Krishna, West Godavari, Guntur and Prakasam districts.
  2. Transplantation could be speeded up and completed early, especially in the tail end submersible lands.
  3. Crops could be saved from damage due to deleterious submersion.
  4. The food grains worth of about Rs.2,500 crores could be produced every year.
  5. Road bridge resulted an overall economy.




Bezwada Anicut

It was a decision to irrigate the Krishna delta with the waters of the great river nearly 150 years ago that brought prosperity to Vijayawada city, once an insignificant village on its banks.There was a famine and there were starvation deaths. Almost 40 per cent of the population succumbed to the drought conditions. But even during this time, the Krishna was "three-fourths full".

Major Beatson, an officer of the East India Company, first called attention to the facilities for irrigation in Kistna district. The next year an astronomer was sent to investigate the subject. He took some levels, but he died in Machilipatnam in 1796. Nobody bothered about tapping the potential of the river for nearly four decades. The terrible famine in 1832 aroused interest in it again, but even after the famine it took two decades to build the anicut. Captain Buckle prepared the first report in favor of a dam across the river in 1839. Only after Sir Arthur Cotton of the Godavari anicut fame approved the views of a few more engineers who made surveys was the project sanctioned, on January 5, 1850. The dam construction started in 1852 and completed in 1855.

According to the 1881 Census, the population of 

  • Bezawada (now Vijayawada) 82,895
  • Nuzvid 1,25,165
  • Nandigama 1,07,288
  • Gudivada 1,28,791
  • Guntur 1,36,083
  • Bandar (now Machilipatnam) 1,75,482

Gordon Mackenzie, the Collector of "Kistna", chronicled in 1883 that the East India Company constructed the Bezwada anicut, the first dam across the Krishna, in 1852. Caption Charles Alexander Orr, who supervised the construction of the dam, in his report submitted on August 9, 1885, said that it cost Rs.7,48,765 to build the dam. 




The anicut lasted its full life of one hundred years and breached in 1952. The existing Prakasam barrage was built in 1954-57 and a road bridge was constructed on it a couple of years later, making Vijayawada a road and railway junction in Andhra Pradesh.









http://www.frontline.in/static/html/fl2118/stories/20040910006912200.htm